[Paul Ross]

Re #353. That wasn't posted to me, so I didn't happen to see you finally belatedly tried to defend your weak position. I would further note the chart is not defined in its assumptions. But one can't help observing from your own chart, the pronounced post-'99 stagnation evident therein.

Doesn't look good for your 'what-me-worry' disinfo operation.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Great, where did I use averages?

But one can't help observing from your own chart, the pronounced post-'99 stagnation evident therein.

It doesn't include 2005 or 2006.

Doesn't look good for your 'what-me-worry' disinfo operation.

Still waiting for you to post some info that shows my info is wrong.