Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: durasell
It's not quite that simple, either. I remember 20 years ago, all the engineers were lording it over the "art majors." And now the engineers are out of work or under employed and the "art majors" are pulling down the big bucks.

And now for a regularly-scheduled reality check:


204 posted on 12/31/2006 11:21:44 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy

I can vouch for that engineering number, anyway.


208 posted on 12/31/2006 11:25:06 AM PST by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

To: 1rudeboy

And now for a regularly-scheduled reality check:




Starting salaries are meaningless since they don't reflect the future earning potential in the profession for someone who is really, really good. I know more than a few art majors who started below $30,000 a year (and some of them at zero a year)and are now at more than five or ten times that salary after a few years out in the world. But again, you have to be really, really good.

That entertainment is one of our major exports is shameful. It doesn't particularly benefit anyone and is easily replaced.


215 posted on 12/31/2006 12:02:58 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

To: 1rudeboy
Looks like the average rate for engineering went down quite a lot since I graduated. It was in the $55k range in 98.
237 posted on 12/31/2006 12:58:50 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson