Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Offers Glimpse of Rationale Behind Its Military Policies
Washington Post ^ | December 30, 2006 | Edward Cody

Posted on 12/30/2006 12:25:00 PM PST by neverdem

BEIJING, Dec. 29 -- China warned Friday that the military landscape in northeast Asia is getting "more complicated and serious" because of North Korea's nuclear weapons program and tighter defense cooperation between Japan and the United States.

The Chinese views on regional security, articulated in a government white paper on national defense, provided a rare glimpse into the strategic assessments that underlie decisions and priorities of the secretive Chinese military and the Communist Party's policymaking Central Military Commission.

In part, the paper was designed as a response to repeated complaints from the Bush administration that China has not explained the rationale behind its long-term military improvement program. China's announced military budget has risen about 10 percent a year recently, reaching $35.4 billion in 2006, and Pentagon specialists estimate that also counting equipment expenditures would more than double it.

Along with Taiwan's pursuit of independence, the government pointed out as particular security challenges North Korea's missile tests last summer and its maiden nuclear test in October, which undermined Chinese-led diplomatic efforts to create a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula. The most recent round of nuclear negotiations took place last week and ended in stalemate, creating doubts about the utility of continuing the three-year-old six-nation talks.

In listing Chinese concerns, the white paper also cited a U.S.-Japanese effort to build a regional missile defense shield based on U.S. ships equipped with the Aegis radar system and a U.S.-Japanese missile now being developed. The joint defense system, portrayed as protection against a North Korean attack, has been criticized by Chinese officials and commentators because it also could blunt China's missile threat in the event of U.S.-Chinese hostilities over Taiwan.

Chinese officials have expressed concern that Taiwan could eventually be integrated into the U.S.-Japanese system, providing a counterweight to China's increasing missile threat against the self-ruled...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; northkorea; taiwan

1 posted on 12/30/2006 12:25:03 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
because of North Korea's nuclear weapons program
Which wouldn't exist without China's tolerance, forbearance and (perhaps) complicity!
2 posted on 12/30/2006 12:31:18 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
China's real policy is, and has always been, to prevent any Western power from establishing a position on its borders--especially its northern (Korea) and Southern (Viet Nam) flanks.

Taiwan is seen as the nidus of a Western infection; hence, this too must be controlled or destroyed.

I don't see China as an expansive position, and if you accept the above almost every move they make is perfectly rational and predictable.
3 posted on 12/30/2006 1:25:37 PM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

China's statement is contrary to their own beliefs, in that they have assisted N. Korea for a number of years. China just laughs at us just as they have during the Korean war during the talks at Pyong Yang.

Besides that, who are they to scoff at us?

China can take a flying leap.

SS


4 posted on 12/30/2006 4:19:47 PM PST by Sword_Svalbardt (Sword Svalbardt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

I have heard that China was being nibbled to death before WW II and has resolved that they will maintain territorial integrity first from now on. They might want Taiwan, more to deny it as a base to a Euro power, especially France, than as something they actually need. China should make an offer, perhaps $2 trillion cash to the USA for Taiwan.


5 posted on 12/30/2006 4:25:33 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

They should offer it to the Taiwanese.


6 posted on 12/30/2006 6:04:19 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Like their wars with India, their support for Pakistan, their deals with Iran, Venezuela, Sudan, their desire to build a blue water navy...

Sorry, that dog won't hunt. They are an imperialist expansionist great power just getting warmed up.

7 posted on 12/30/2006 7:28:43 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
China in Revolt

Hillary falls to earth in poll race

GRAPHIC: Anti-American Feeling Abroad

That's Character - The dignity of Ford's post-presidency

From time to time, I’ll ping on noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs. FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

8 posted on 12/30/2006 9:31:36 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thanks for the ping!


9 posted on 12/30/2006 9:51:59 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

"China Offer Glimpse of Rationale Behind its Military Policies."

Regional military/political hegemony and world political influence. End of story. Next!


10 posted on 12/30/2006 10:05:52 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tainan
What do you think?
11 posted on 12/30/2006 11:04:45 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Either we bring them freedom, or they destroy us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
"What do you think?"

My thoughts? Its nothing more than a policy paper put together by a mid-level on orders from his boss. Doesn't really tell anything not already known.

The big build-up of the PLAN surface fleet is from Russian with Love - Thanks Putin. And its sub fleet technology is mostly extrapolated tech fear they obtained from the USA under the Clinton*/algore regime "Tech for $$$" exchange.

China knows that NK/Lil Kim is a loose cannon and is, IMO, going to play nice with Japan/USA in that area to lessen their damage when his balloon goes up. And I look for increased border skirmishes in 2007.

China and Japan are still hostile on overt & covert levels. This will stay unchanged. I think Japan will become increasingly open about being part of the US umbrella in the region. They want new jets and technology.

Taiwan? You really have to live here to see the craziness that s Taiwan politics. Thats all I will say right now.

Best to you and Yours.

12 posted on 12/31/2006 12:39:16 AM PST by Tainan (New & Improved, just in time for the Christmas and New Years Holidays!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Image hosted by Photobucket.comthank you...

their willfull child, has truly become their PROBLEM child!!!

13 posted on 12/31/2006 6:55:07 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

China ping!


14 posted on 12/31/2006 7:09:20 AM PST by Eaker (You were given the choice between war & dishonor. You chose dishonor & you will have war. -Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
How can anyone in their right mind trust a Godless nation to keep their word.

North Korea did not and neither will Russia or China.

Our whole State Department is made up of useless bureaucrats deeply entrenched in self preservation.

I think so deeply that asking them to defend Americas interest would offend them.
15 posted on 12/31/2006 7:13:56 AM PST by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia now a certified socialist state reporting to Mexico City for further instructions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
China should make an offer, perhaps $2 trillion cash to the USA for Taiwan.

Why pay so much when they get far more bang for the buck by just buying our leadership ala Clinton.

16 posted on 12/31/2006 8:12:26 AM PST by Colorado Doug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eaker
Thanks Tom.

34.6 billion is an extremely low figure. It is more like, IMHO, 80-100 billion, and they can do a LOT more with that type of money than we can because they do not have the same environmental, legal, safety, salary, benefit issues we provide for our own personnel and the equipment they use.

China's military buildup is pretty phenominal, particulalry the Naval Buildup and all the new, modern vessels thay are putting to sea in very uick order. It is not being done to have them to play in a bathtub for their admirals.

Look for my 2007 update to that site in late January sometime.

17 posted on 12/31/2006 8:39:45 AM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

I tell people about China's bluewater Navy and they don't believe me. Our media sure has done a fine job of hiding this information.

There is only one reason that they are building such a vast fleet.

Churchill got it right.

You were given the choice between war & dishonor. You chose dishonor & you will have war. -Churchill


18 posted on 12/31/2006 8:49:57 AM PST by Eaker (You were given the choice between war & dishonor. You chose dishonor & you will have war. -Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Colorado Doug

$2 Trillion does steal alot of election especially if each american where given $1000.00 Checks to vote Hillary. Thats around $300 Billion (Something China can afford) and is worth the investment when Klintoon reduces the army and gives away the technology. She'd have no choice to accept after she'd sold her sold to the commies for the election win.


19 posted on 12/31/2006 9:58:43 AM PST by Petey139
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson