Posted on 12/30/2006 12:04:41 PM PST by Blackirish
NEW YORK Just to prepare you for the new year's press frenzy surrounding the still-distant 2008 race for president, here are latest December poll results in key primary states from American Research Group.
(Excerpt) Read more at editorandpublisher.com ...
Given the choices in this article, I hope None of the Above enters the race.
Fortunately she can't beat my main-man Rudy.
I've got a feeling that the liberal MSM is going to be polling us until we puke between now and November 2008. Pollsters are starting to outnumber "lawyers" in this country and I don't think that's a good thing.
Rudy/McCaine v Hillary/Wes Clark ?
Since the pollsters predicted a Gore victory, and then a Kerry victory, I don't think much of them.
Well, I doubt Wes Clark will be the Democrat VP. There are hordes of online activists Dems who love the guy. Many Democrats want to feel knowledgable and patriotic when they advocate surrender, putting the Gitmo terrorists back into circulation, abandoning Israel, abandoning Iraq, granting the French a veto over American security, giving therapy to fascists like Assad and Ahmadinejad -- and Wes Clark fills that need. It is the same principle why they chose Kerry-- he gives the appearance of being a pro-war guy while advocating policy that works against the United States.
At least McCain knows what he is doing with regard to foreign policy and would smackdown a country like Iran if he needed to. Wes Clark-- it is diplo-speak with fascists, 24/7, a Neville Chamberlain with stars.
That being said, Wes Clark's ego, like McCain's, is too big to be second banana. Maybe Hillary would pick Obama, but my money is on Evan Bayh, given the Clintons play the game ruthlessly and intelligently.
Giuliani will probably pick someone like Mark Sanford-- someone conservative enough to convince the anti's in the party, but who won't do radical stuff in speech or deed to alienate swing voters.
I still think McCain won't get the nod, he will run independent to soothe his gigantic ego, and to thwart the republicans....again
Many Democrats want to feel knowledgable and patriotic when they advocate surrender, putting the Gitmo terrorists back into circulation, abandoning Israel, abandoning Iraq, granting the French a veto over American security, giving therapy to fascists like Assad and Ahmadinejad -- and Wes Clark fills that need. It is the same principle why they chose Kerry-- he gives the appearance of being a pro-war guy while advocating policy that works against the United States.Excellent analysis of why the treason party likes Clark.
Rudy/McCaine v Hillary/Wes Clark ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.