Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Women face being excluded as donors because proteins called human leukocyte antibodies are created in their bodies during pregnancy. People transfused with plasma that carries the antibodies are more likely to develop a rare but potentially deadly lung condition."
1 posted on 12/29/2006 12:19:21 PM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Enterprise
People transfused with plasma that carries the antibodies are more likely to develop a rare but potentially deadly lung condition."

The people be damned. Where's the ACLU when you need them to stop this blatant discrimination?

2 posted on 12/29/2006 12:21:34 PM PST by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise

Why do I sense a Class Action lawsuit to be forthcoming ?


3 posted on 12/29/2006 12:24:13 PM PST by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise
This poor young lady obviously suffers from this deadly condition.
She falls over forward frequently and could strike her head on something hard.


4 posted on 12/29/2006 12:24:43 PM PST by ASA Vet (The WOT should have been over on 9/12/01.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise

So why don't they just do a pregancy test first?


13 posted on 12/29/2006 12:38:51 PM PST by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise

Blood is not plasma - is the title wrong?

You can donate blood that can be turned into plasma. I think the story needs to be written and fixed.


16 posted on 12/29/2006 12:47:00 PM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise

The title is misleading. Apparently the ban would be on women who have been pregnant.


22 posted on 12/29/2006 12:58:05 PM PST by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise
Deaths attributed to transfusion-related lung injuries are rare — about 1 in 220,000 people transfused. But in a bulletin issued to blood banks on Nov. 3, the blood bank association said the lung injuries, which averaged 24 deaths in the United States from 2003 to 2005, were the most frequent cause of transfusion-related death reported to the federal Food and Drug Administration.

So they're not even really sure? I wonder what the number of deaths do to medical incompetence in hospitals each year is. Maybe we should close down all hospitals?

Deaths are unfortunate and it would be good if EVERY unnecessary death could be prevented, but this seems like an over reaction. Maybe there's something in some people's physology that makes them prone to it and they ought to be looking at whether some type of screening could help.

29 posted on 12/29/2006 1:04:08 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Enterprise

Sheer insanity. There have been a tiny number of lung deaths in the period this idiot science was derived from. There would be far more deaths from having insufficient blood supplies than from this wildly improbable potential.

No one who ever took a statistics course (and understood it) or one in logic would recommend such a destructive course. But it may just be wild speculation on the paper's part. Not much you can believe in these rags today.


45 posted on 12/29/2006 7:38:55 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson