Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Valin
Someone conned the White House into thinking that Saddam was part of the war on terror. We now know that whatever else he was guilty of, he loathed and despised Islamic fundamentalism and it hated him.

As far as I'm concerned Forsyth is another preeminent moron.

Saddam supported terrorists. Period. He gave money to Palestinians whose family members committed terrorism. He gave medical care and asylum to terrorists. We have more than enough documents outlining Saddam's assistance to terrorists.

As far as the situation in Iraq, and I've held this opinion since 2003, if in 2010 we have not obtained our goals of a stable peaceful Iraq then I'll question our policies but here and now not even 4 years since the operation began I say to big winded pundits of no consequence, go jump in a lake.

5 posted on 12/29/2006 8:46:55 AM PST by A message (We who care, Can Not Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: A message

It is an amazing time we live in. Hussein was routinely firing missiles at our pilots in the no-fly zone in the leadup to the Iraq War and yet that is not considered legitimate grounds for going to war him. In times past though, simple words from the other side were enough to justify going to war against the aggressor (a la Hitler's declaration of war on the United States). Now apparently one has to have thousands of one's countrymen killed on their home soil, before it is considered legitimate to go to war against the attacker. Such lunacy does not bode well for the health of countries that such a high hurdle for responding to attacks on their citizens.


17 posted on 12/29/2006 9:16:47 AM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson