Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mo1
...even Obama in his new book admits SS is in trouble.

The only reason SS is in trouble is that Bush and other Republican politicians refuse to respect the existence of the SS trust fund. The trust fund is not funded by any gold or other hard assets, just like U.S. Govt. bonds held by China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, and other U.S. creditors. Do Bush and the neocons really think we should pay interest on bonds held by Russia and China while at the same time refusing to pay off SS bonds held by the trust fund so that seniors can receive their monthly checks?

I'd like to see some enterprising reporters ask these questions of Bush and other neocon politicians at ever available opportunity.

39 posted on 12/29/2006 8:05:02 AM PST by MurryMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: MurryMom

Do you like to post to prove just how stupid you are?


41 posted on 12/29/2006 8:10:40 AM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: MurryMom
The trust fund is not funded by any gold or other hard assets

You mean like private accounts holding stocks and bonds? That's a great idea!

43 posted on 12/29/2006 8:12:03 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with EPI, you're not a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson