To: NormsRevenge
"...and four began firing at police..."
If so, it would appear that the police were justified in firing back.
2 posted on
12/28/2006 2:59:53 PM PST by
Buck W.
(If you push something hard enough, it will fall over.)
To: NormsRevenge
"We cannot allow our police officers to shoot and kill our citizens without justification like rabid dogs,"
I'm glad he hasn't made any public comments that might prejudice the officers' chances of a fair trial.
3 posted on
12/28/2006 3:02:30 PM PST by
Spok
(He who bites the hands that feeds him will lick the boot that kicks him.)
To: NormsRevenge
7 posted on
12/28/2006 3:09:43 PM PST by
Enterprise
(Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
To: NormsRevenge
I believe i recall this incident.Weren't the police fired on first?Oops i forgot,this is the AP.Don't let facts get in the way of a juicy article.
8 posted on
12/28/2006 3:12:16 PM PST by
Thombo2
To: NormsRevenge
Obviously a District Attorney from the Nifong school.
13 posted on
12/28/2006 3:25:18 PM PST by
reg45
To: NormsRevenge
Had I been in New Orleans with the police rioting like they were and acting on unConstituional orders from that petulant wanna-be dictator Nagin I would've fired on them, too. Once they started violating people's rights and stealing people's water, food, guns, supplies, vehicles, and then shooting at people who were trying to escape the death camp that was the stadium they were no longer police: they were just thugs.
The majority were decent cops, sure, but I ask if they were all so decent then why were *all* of them executing numerous illegal orders?
14 posted on
12/28/2006 3:29:45 PM PST by
PeterFinn
(The end of islam is the beginning of peace.)
To: NormsRevenge
"four began firing at police,"
that changes everything. This prosecution is wrong and illegal.
Typical of liberal administrations which want to shift the blame onto the innocent.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson