Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gold Bugs Ready for Revelry
The Street ^ | 28 December 2006 | Simon Constable

Posted on 12/28/2006 10:28:20 AM PST by shrinkermd

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Toddsterpatriot

That's correct. As soon as I notice a bargain the pros have already been there a day ansd a half.


21 posted on 12/28/2006 12:16:39 PM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Then how do you explain this:

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/contrarians-betting-gold-outperform-equities/story.aspx?guid=%7BBD202A60%2D503A%2D471C%2DAAF5%2D59A951E64E61%7D

According to Hulbert's newsletter surveys, the pundits are very lukewarm on gold and the "contrarians" are buying it. Opinions and noses.


22 posted on 12/28/2006 12:22:16 PM PST by groanup (Limited government is the answer. Now, what's the question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbill
I always get worried when the analysts start cheering.

The "cheering" in this article is from the fringes. First, CNBC needs to stop talking about DJII 15000 and FOMC rate cuts. Next, you have to recognize at least two "gold bugs" of this article's caliber by name. At that point, the gold rush would still be nowhere near halfway done, price-wise or time-wise.

23 posted on 12/28/2006 1:11:55 PM PST by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wbill
Analysts are like the guys you see on Sunday mornings hocking their sports pics that for just $10.95 a call they guarantee you the winners.

If either was actually able to predict the future like they claim, they wouldn't be working as they would have already made billions on their predictions.

24 posted on 12/28/2006 2:10:41 PM PST by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Simple answer: You don't.

Gold is a wealth holding exercise, not an expansion thereof. It is what you 'bank' as safe, as opposed to investing in the stock market. The market can reap great rewards, or great losses, but gold is a conservation play.

That is why placing all your eggs in one basket will get you burned. All gold? You will lose to the dynamic market that reaps rewards based on risk. All risk? You have the unfortunate postion of losing large sums in an ill advised stock holding, or general failure of confidence. It happens from time to time.

So, while some gold will help in the long run, it is something that can only be used as a fall back position. It is the true definition of money as defined by the Founders, so is the safe play. But safe is also not the name of todays fiscal game. Have some safe plays, but don't neglect the capital producing segments. They will reap the true rewards overall.


25 posted on 12/28/2006 10:00:34 PM PST by ex 98C MI Dude (All of my hate cannot be found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson