Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rhombus
I wasn't pleased with the continuation of Detente either. This legitimized the Soviet Union with the assumption that we had to live with them.
I could go either way on this, but a strong case can be made for Detente. Pure Communism is a system that can't sustain itself for long. Even China has been moving to a market based economy. Letting time run its course helped it to implode economically from within. At the same time Nixon was splitting China away from the Soviets and forced them to think about their eastern border. Divide and conquer is a time honored strategy of war.

At any rate, Ford only had 2 unexpected years. I don't see what he could have done but continue most of Nixon's policies.

Of course we could have had Spiro Agnew as president. I suspect we may have been blessed in that respect.
144 posted on 12/28/2006 11:58:48 AM PST by 21stCenturyFreeThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: 21stCenturyFreeThinker

It's hard to say whether or not Detente helped during the Nixon/Ford years or only delayed the Soviet collapse. Still, no one now seems to think Reagan SHOULD have continued the policies of detente which were in place only a few short years before his election.


146 posted on 12/28/2006 12:05:18 PM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson