Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o
Wow! No ifs, ands or buts! If the urge strikes them!

It would seem that this is what you meant with that statement. I think if you will read my entire post you'll find that I am not for rampant promiscuous sexual activity. I merely realize that it isn't realistic to assume that we can get everyone to abstain.

39 posted on 12/29/2006 2:41:47 PM PST by SALChamps03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: SALChamps03
"I am not for rampant promiscuous sexual activity. I merely realize that it isn't realistic to assume that we can get everyone to abstain."

I don't know anyone who assumes we can get everyone to abstain.

I don't even believe in mere abstinence per se. I mean, for instance, that there are wrong ways and reasons to abstain, too. If people were abstaining merely because of an intense hatred or fear of sex, that would be dreadfully wrong,. If people were abstaining because they'd taken some hypothetical drug that robbed them of all possibility of sexual feeling, that would be ghastly wrong as well.

What we need is the intelligent, loving, and harmonious use and practice of sexuality. It's a fine, fine gift: sex lived right.

40 posted on 12/29/2006 3:47:52 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Good sex: the basis of a good civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson