Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
Since the rape charges have been dropped, there is no longer a (legal) need to keep the accusers name confidential.

If the MSM (msm should probably be in lower case) always manages to include the full names, and their pictures, of the (former) alleged rapists why don't they now identify and print the dancers name and picture for all the world to see and know?

Will Jesse Jackson now retract the "full scholarship" for the 'unknown name' dancer since she, herself, has exonerated the (former) alleged rapists?

47 posted on 12/27/2006 2:56:05 PM PST by Freeper (I was culture in the 60's and now with Clinton "running things" I am suddenly Counter-Culture.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Freeper
There was nothing preventing the MSM from printing the whores name to begin with. The rape shield law only applies to the courtroom in the US.
49 posted on 12/27/2006 3:42:59 PM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson