Replies

Sandy Burgler was caught once stuffing documents down his pants etc., how many times had he done the same thing over a long period of time and got away with it?

Rockefeller yesterday was so sure of himself when he made the announcement that there was no records or connection to Atta before 9/11. Why was he so sure and confident about his statement?........he knows a hell of a lot more than what he's telling.....a hell of a lot more.

Security that has anything to do with the Clintons era and crimes against the USA and their cronies is so lax, why couldn't ex-FBI agents [i.e. members of the VIPS] or those still working there have just walked in and took or copied files since I'm sure their faces were well known to the clerks and wouldn't be questioned

Since we know there are moles still in the FBI, how many moles are in Gonzalez' dept?

Seems to me that while we still have a fragment of a country left there needs to be some heavy background checks done on everyone regardless how long they've been employed, with mega doses of truth serum used to everyone working in a critical position. I know that would never happen, too many would fight against it, but I see no other way to get answers to so many questions and put a stop to all these leaks that put all US citizens and our military in danger. It's got to the point where you can't trust anyone on DC anymore.

That line of thought occurred to me. But my first guess would be that there are technical/bureaucratic problems with the transition from pre-computerized to computerized filing systems underlying this. The original FBI filing system was based on the Library of Congress' cataloging system. It was cutting-edge for its time, but it was before the dawn of computers and was not designed with computerized searching in mind, and the upgrade to a computerized filing system has been a bumpy ride.