Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aussie Dasher
Edwards could take all before him...

Agree. I take him very seriously. He was the smartest candidate in the '04 primaries. He is slicker that the Slickster himself. He has prior Presidential stump experience, name recognition, and he knows exactly how to play to irrational emotions. I think he WILL get the D nomination, because Hillary won't (she's burnt out politically, plus about 1/3 of the DEMS hate her).

That leaves Edwards as the most viable candidate. He has a source of lavish funding from the Trial Lawyers and his populist message will sell very well all across the spectrum of Democrats. The candidate who can draw support from traditional Dems and the far Left will be the nominee. And that man is John Edwards.

The good news is that no populist candidate has ever won the Presidency. But Edwards will con the entire Democratic Party, that's my assessment.

49 posted on 12/23/2006 10:43:57 PM PST by ARepublicanForAllReasons (I hereby pledge to endeavor to eliminate most sarcasm from my posts... (NOT!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: ARepublicanForAllReasons

No one is slicker than Slick himself

Clinton was a once in a generation charlatan

That said, Edwards should not be dismissed. In the end, I think it'll come down to him or Obama. Although, one can never count out Hillary.

If I was Barack or John, I'd stay away from Ft Marcy Park.

I think an Obama/Richardson ticket would be very formidable.

Given the dems record, though, they'll probably go with Clinton and lose again


55 posted on 12/24/2006 3:42:29 AM PST by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson