Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GSlob
Each adultery has TWO participants.

Not neccessarily. An unmarried man having sex with a married woman is not committing adultery. The woman is, as she is breaking her vow. The man is not breaking a vow. The same if an unmarried woman has sex with a married man.

188 posted on 12/23/2006 7:16:18 PM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Jack Black

see # 121


192 posted on 12/23/2006 7:17:50 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

Ah. I'm off the hook!


202 posted on 12/23/2006 7:21:07 PM PST by null and void (Propaganda doesn't have to make sense. Hell, it often works better if it doesn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

The cuckoo is attacking a family unit in his own way--and is utterly morally culpable. The word--"homewrecker"--And if he gets his member shot off by the angry husband, don't bother putting me on the jury.


210 posted on 12/23/2006 7:25:31 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black
An unmarried man having sex with a married woman is not committing adultery.

Not so. Anyone who engages in voluntary act of sexual intercourse involving a married person and someone other than his or her spouse is an adulterer. This standard definition is completely independent of which party is married or whether they even know the other person is married.

437 posted on 12/23/2006 9:20:26 PM PST by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson