Skip to comments.
U.N. Security Council imposes sanctions on Iran
Yahoo ^
Posted on 12/23/2006 9:03:31 AM PST by Sub-Driver
U.N. Security Council imposes sanctions on Iran
8 minutes ago
The U.N. Security Council on Saturday unanimously imposed sanctions on Iran's trade in sensitive nuclear materials and ballistic missiles, in a move aimed at getting Tehran to halt uranium enrichment work.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: angryletter; bombirannow; bombnuclearsites; bomboilpipelines; bomboilwells; dejavualloveragain; iran; iranfundingterror; iraniansanctions; killalqaeda; killhamas; killhezbollah; killterrorists; lol; sanctions; scratchytoiletpaper; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
To: Sub-Driver
I can hear the laughing all the way from Tehran.
2
posted on
12/23/2006 9:04:41 AM PST
by
dfwgator
To: Sub-Driver
What....did the Russian's miss the meeting....slept over again?
3
posted on
12/23/2006 9:05:47 AM PST
by
spokeshave
(The Democrat Party stands for open treason in a time of war.)
To: Sub-Driver
I guess that the "letter" from the UN will keep the Pajama boys up all night.
Meadow Muffin
4
posted on
12/23/2006 9:06:12 AM PST
by
rwgal
To: Sub-Driver
Mullahs don't care about useless UN
5
posted on
12/23/2006 9:07:42 AM PST
by
Biscuit85
(I hate CNN!)
To: Sub-Driver
Now that they're "work" is done, these UN officals will be going to Manhattan strip clubs on our dime.
To: Sub-Driver
Yeah, that'll show 'em. I'm sure they are packing up all their nukes and sending much of their stuff back to Russia right now. Not.
7
posted on
12/23/2006 9:08:39 AM PST
by
3AngelaD
(ic.)
To: Sub-Driver
Well, the stage is set to our having tried diplomacy. When sanctions don't work, who will it be taking out the nuclear sites? Us or Israel?
8
posted on
12/23/2006 9:08:57 AM PST
by
Blogger
To: Sub-Driver
This is more important than it sounds. It obviously won't stop Iran from continuing to attempt to assemble the Bomb, but it's a slap in their face that they desperately wanted to avoid.
It might just make things worse, but it is an important development.
9
posted on
12/23/2006 9:09:36 AM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Sub-Driver
Whooope.
All kinds of material import bans, financial bans, and even the travel bans are gone.
It amounts to another 'nasty letter' warning of further consequences if they do listen FOR REAL this time.
10
posted on
12/23/2006 9:11:03 AM PST
by
FreedomNeocon
(Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
To: Biscuit85
That may be the only thing we and the Mullahs have in common.
11
posted on
12/23/2006 9:13:42 AM PST
by
Farmer Dean
(Every time a toilet flushes,another liberal gets his brains.)
To: Farmer Dean
Well, we wouldn't go to UN if we really didn't care about it
12
posted on
12/23/2006 9:15:49 AM PST
by
Biscuit85
(I hate CNN!)
To: Sub-Driver
Does that mean that after 17 warnings we can bomb them?
13
posted on
12/23/2006 9:17:09 AM PST
by
fish hawk
(. B O stinks.)
To: FreedomNeocon
Don't listen this time (again) that is.
Anyway I guess some others are right... at least we're a step closer to the eventual ultimate failure of the diplomacy route.
I think letting the Euro's deal with Iran was done because we have always known Iran was not going to back down and we are already convinced there will be war at some point. The Euro's however thought diplomacy would work, and instead of having them argue with us trying to 'persuade' us to talk, we figured it'd be better to let them talk to Iran and learn for themselves just how useless it is (especially when the 'US Boogyman' is removed from the equation).
Point is, another step down that road I guess... we'll see where it goes.
14
posted on
12/23/2006 9:17:25 AM PST
by
FreedomNeocon
(Success is not final; Failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts -- Churchill)
To: Sub-Driver
Given the UN's history, the prospects of sanctions enforcement aren't that great. Three words hang over today's Security Council vote: Oil For Food.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
15
posted on
12/23/2006 9:17:30 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Biscuit85
Just going through the motions to go to the UN for any help.Nothing will come of anything they do,anyone here who really believes differently?
16
posted on
12/23/2006 9:20:08 AM PST
by
Farmer Dean
(Every time a toilet flushes,another liberal gets his brains.)
To: FreedomNeocon
Yes, but did the UN use all caps or bolded fonts to show they really mean it this time?
To: Sub-Driver
Why by golly that'll teach em- Oh the inhumanity of such brutal sanctions- I'm surprised the U.N didn't offer a couple of billion to them to offset the aweful conditions of the sanctions! http://sacredscoop.com
18
posted on
12/23/2006 9:30:22 AM PST
by
CottShop
To: goldstategop
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Not to hijack the the thread, but it occurs to me that if mohammed were alive today, he wouldn't be much different in word and deed from Charles Manson.
19
posted on
12/23/2006 9:31:09 AM PST
by
brownsfan
(It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
To: Sub-Driver
That'll stop'em!
/no sarc tag needed on this one
20
posted on
12/23/2006 9:31:48 AM PST
by
KoRn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson