The DA knew that there was no DNA match to the accused BEFORE he indicted them.
(The DNA tests were so sensitive that they picked up DNA from five other sexual contacts, plus contamination by the lab technician--who contaminated the sample despite the rigorous cleanliness of the lab.)
But somehow we are expected to believe that THREE guys raped and struggled with this woman for ten minutes to half an hour, in a grungy college kid's bathroom, and left no DNA at all?
Plus we are to believe that the accused, who have pictures and witnesses placing them elsewhere, can be in two places at the same time?
The judge who permitted this case to go forward--Stephens--is a buddy and mentor of Nifong. He signed the original warrants--which we now know were based on false info given him.
Yet he still did not quash the warrants; he permitted Nifong to delay discovery and hide evidence; he permitted Nifong to not have to read all the documents in the case,
etc.
He is as much a part of this conspiracy to frame the defendants as anyone else.
The NC bar committee, which has been a paper tiger for years (consider the slap on the wrist given to the Gell case DA--who is now a judge!), may finally have to do some serious work, or look like more of a laughingstock than they already do.
The SBI lab could not find anything at all on anything in the rape kit. No trace of blood, saliva, or semen on any of the swabs. No foreign pubic hairs. Nothing. This was on evidence collected right after a supposed violent 3 man gang rape and beating sans condoms.
Nifong knew that on March 28th.
That was the end of the case for any normal DA.
Nifong then goes out and buys a new report, withholds part of it, and leaks the idea that it implicates LAX players.
No, we're not expected to believe it. A racist jury of Nifong's picking is supposed to believe it, and will because they want to. He doesn't care what anybody else believes anymore than OJ cares what anybody else except his criminal trial jury chose to believe.