[mkjessup]

I found one paragraph in what I believe to be the initial AP story somewhat interesting
[bold emphasis mine]:

"Berger, with the authorization of former President Clinton, was reviewing National Security Council documents on Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida, Sudan, and related presidential correspondence. The review was to facilitate Berger's impending testimony before the House and Senate intelligence committees."

That paragraph doesn't seem to be included in most versions of this story, but as of 0500 EST, it was still in this story:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061220/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/berger_documents_1

The question is, if Berger was acting with the "authorization" of his former boss, did that authorization include instructions to dispose of and sanitize anything potentially threatening to the "most ethical administration in history" as Emperor Billigula used to refer to his regime?

Too bad the Inspector General will probably ignore this facet of the alleged 'investigation' into Sandy Burglar's actions.

[samtheman]

Too bad the Inspector General will probably ignore this facet of the alleged 'investigation' into Sandy Burglar's actions.

Too bad.