Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report Says Berger Hid Archive Documents (under a construction trailer)
Associated Press ^ | Dec 20, 2006 | LARRY MARGASAK

Posted on 12/20/2006 2:12:49 PM PST by Mr. Mojo

Former national security adviser Sandy Berger removed classified documents from the National Archives in 2003 and hid them under a construction trailer, the Archives inspector general reported Wednesday. The report was issued more than a year after Berger pleaded guilty and received a criminal sentence for removal of the documents.

Inspector General Paul Brachfeld reported that when Berger was confronted by Archives officials about the missing documents, he said it was possible he threw them in his office trash.

The report said that when Archives employees first suspected that Berger _ who had been President Clinton's national security adviser _ was removing classified documents from the Archives in the fall of they failed to notify any law enforcement agency.

Berger, who pleaded guilty to unlawfully removing and retaining classified documents, was fined $50,000, ordered to perform 100 hours of community service and was barred from access to classified material for three years.

The report said that when Berger was reviewing the classified documents in the Archives building a few blocks from the Capitol, employees saw him bending down and fiddling with something white, which could have been paper, around his ankle.

However, Archives employees did not feel at the time there was enough information to confront someone of Berger's stature, the report said.

Brachfeld reported that on one visit, Berger took a break to go outside without an escort.

"In total, during this visit, he removed four documents ... .

"Mr. Berger said he placed the documents under a trailer in an accessible construction area outside Archives 1 (the main Archives building)."

Berger acknowledged that he later retrieved the documents from the construction area and returned with them to his office.

Berger, with the authorization of former President Clinton, was reviewing National Security Council documents on Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida, Sudan, and related presidential correspondence. The review was to facilitate Berger's impending testimony before the House and Senate intelligence committees.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: berger; bighouse; bill; clinton; crime; documents; felon; felony; hughnews; jailtime; nationalarchives; obstructionofjustice; pantsgate; prison; puthiminjail; ratcrime; ratcriminal; sandyberger; sandybergler; sandyburglar; slaponthewrist; sloppysandy; soxdocs; theburglar; treason; trousergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 361-375 next last
To: woofie

Heck, I forgot to add the "Travelgate files" too.


201 posted on 12/20/2006 5:38:50 PM PST by stockstrader ("Where government advances--and it advances relentlessly--freedom is imperiled"-Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Too many files to remember


202 posted on 12/20/2006 5:39:59 PM PST by woofie (For some people self hatred may be justified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Look, the Republicans were in charge of Congress at the time. They could have investigated this in depth, but they let it go. Now the Democrats will investigate the hell out of the Republican administration members.

The stupid party!


203 posted on 12/20/2006 5:41:22 PM PST by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

It's the same crime, so I don't think that it can be retried anywhere. But, I could be wrong. You'll have to ask a lawyer.


204 posted on 12/20/2006 5:42:38 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
I'm more worried about the White House slapping his fingers than Sandy Burglers espionage.. Gonzalez evidently could care less about all this.. FBI don't care.. CIA is talking to the Secret Services hand.. And whoever is in charge at the Archives is whisling trying to look busy..

This is much bigger than Sandy Burglar...

205 posted on 12/20/2006 5:49:40 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #206 Removed by Moderator

To: Mr. Mojo

He should have used the Hillary defense: "I can't remember, my brain's in a blender, it's Jello!"


207 posted on 12/20/2006 5:56:47 PM PST by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

Don't deface Grimace with that harpy's visage. Grimace deserves better!


208 posted on 12/20/2006 5:57:31 PM PST by DrGunsforHands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

whatever sandy took out will become evident at his untimely death... noone involved with the clintons will allow them to make a clean break... blue dress, vince foster... berger took something, but has it under glass until he needs it.

teeman


209 posted on 12/20/2006 6:07:32 PM PST by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

210 posted on 12/20/2006 6:08:36 PM PST by Lady Jag (Bravery is being the only one who knows you're afraid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo

WHAT’S IN SANDY’S PANTS

“Far from merely taking copies of national security documents to ‘refresh’ his memory about Clinton administration anti-terrorism policies, (former Clinton National Security Adviser Sandy) Berger took five different versions of a review of the Clinton team’s record on terrorism written in 2000 by White House aide Richard Clarke.

Each version contained unique handwritten notes or markings made by various high-level recipients of the memo.

In other words, each copy could reveal the responses of various key administration players to Mr. Clarke’s analysis of how the Clinton administration had responded to the rising threat of attacks on the U.S. homeland.

For reasons known only to himself, Mr. Berger shredded three of the five versions of the memo in his office.

- John Fund, Political Diary, 4/1/05

The Wide Awakes

211 posted on 12/20/2006 6:10:37 PM PST by henbane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Where is the Trial for TREASON?????????


212 posted on 12/20/2006 6:17:25 PM PST by Danae (Anail nathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do chel denmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
snip "The notes said Berger had not been aware that Archives staff had been tracking the documents he was provided because of earlier suspicions from previous visits that he was removing materials. Also, the employees had made copies of some documents."
snip.

Apparently stealing and destroying documents from the NA was part of berglers regular routine.

213 posted on 12/20/2006 6:21:27 PM PST by AmeriBrit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

This AP article fails to mention Berger is also on two years probation. The AP sometimes uses Berger as a foreign policy source when doing stories critical of Bush.


214 posted on 12/20/2006 6:25:44 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000
WTF?..This man is walking free???

Yep..and he has one man to thank for it...George Walker Bush.

215 posted on 12/20/2006 6:28:42 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000
This man is walking free???

He was a member of the Iraq Study Group.

216 posted on 12/20/2006 6:30:38 PM PST by AmishDude (I coined "Senator Ass" to describe Jim Webb. He may have already used it as a character in a novel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

Hi, Wolfstar. I vaguely remember that the judge gave Berger a harsher sentence than DOJ asked for. And since the sentence Berger got was basically a slap on the wrist, then DOJ didn't ask for much of a sentence.

He was caught red handed. The archive folks had him on tape for at least one of the instances that he stole documents. There were four separate instances, iirc.

The whole thing is fishy.


217 posted on 12/20/2006 6:31:39 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Do you think the AP had this info on, say, Nov. 1?


218 posted on 12/20/2006 6:34:33 PM PST by AmishDude (I coined "Senator Ass" to describe Jim Webb. He may have already used it as a character in a novel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: AmeriBrit

Can anyone explain why (other than the usual lib biased mendacity) the IG is only reporting on this NOW, years after the crime and just days before Xmas and long after Sandy Burglar escaped with only the mildest legal penalties???

This Burglar-scum stole documents of extremely high classification, destroyed several of them, and did who knows what other nefarious deeds to obstruct the investigation of the 9/11 Omission-commission.

Anyone in the military who pulled this kind of garbage with such highly classified materials would have faced very serious charges, an end of career, and major personal jeopardy. Yet, the Burglar gets away with a light wrist-slap and the prospect of re-joining a future 'Rat administration when he should be in JAIL and barred from ever handling classified materials again.

The claim that the "content" of relevant documents was presented to the 9/11 frauds is obvious b.s. Sandy Burglar was risking jail and disgrace to destroy the handwritten notes of certain WH officials, most obviously Bill Clinton..... there is no other plausible explanation of why the Burglar would run such extreme risks to destroy documents that (it is claimed) the 9/11 Omission would see anyway.

Just how did this crappy IG get away with suppressing this vital information and report until the very end of the Republican Congress (not that those weaklings would have acted anyway)???? Once again Clintonista crime, depravity, and obstruction of justice has been aided and abetted by Quisling bureaucrats, MSM hacks, DNC stooges, and vapid weakling Republicans.


219 posted on 12/20/2006 6:34:46 PM PST by Enchante (Chamberlain Democrats embraced by terrorists and America-haters worldwide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Williams
exactly. Berger is another missed opportunity we had. We could have gotten a lot of miles out of the rotten bastard but as usual the Republicans play too nice. I would have brought up his name EVERY chance i got . EVERY single time the Dems brought up 'culture of corruption" I'd say his name . But , we NEVER defended ourselves of went after the Dems with any effect . Now they are all over DC like they own the place. Missed opportunities killed us for sure.
220 posted on 12/20/2006 6:35:29 PM PST by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 361-375 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson