[cogitator]

while only 3% offer balanced coverage.

If "balanced coverage" means getting a counterpoint quote from a member of the list of skeptics below:

List of scientists opposing global warming consensus

then it's not balanced, it's skewed in favor of the skeptics. Why? Because getting a quote from a skeptical source expressing the opinion that there might be some uncertainty about the results of a particular study increases the perception that there is uncertainty about the results of a particular study, even if there actually isn't much uncertainty!

[Always Right]

Because getting a quote from a skeptical source expressing the opinion that there might be some uncertainty about the results of a particular study increases the perception that there is uncertainty about the results of a particular study, even if there actually isn't much uncertainty!

LOL, and on a related note, just because you are parinoid does not mean they aren't out to get you.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Why? Because getting a quote from a skeptical source expressing the opinion that there might be some uncertainty about the results of a particular study increases the perception that there is uncertainty about the results of a particular study, even if there actually isn't much uncertainty!

Reasonable people disagree. It's best to hear them out.