Again, I do not believe that the earth is flat.
And I would stand in proud company with Sir Fred Hoyle, Max Born and Albert Einstein is acknowledging that there is no 'scientific' way to tell whether heliocentrism or geocentrism is true.
I merely point this out to you if you are able to accept it.
>>And I would stand in proud company with Sir Fred Hoyle
You mean the thoroughly discredited science fiction writer?
>>And I would stand in proud company with Sir Fred Hoyle, Max Born and Albert Einstein is acknowledging that there is no 'scientific' way to tell whether heliocentrism or geocentrism is true.
I suppose you want a sticker on science texts for that too?
>>And I would stand in proud company with Sir Fred Hoyle, Max Born and Albert Einstein is acknowledging that there is no 'scientific' way to tell whether heliocentrism or geocentrism is true.
I see that your major scientific readings are off the creationist web sites. I never realized before how many of you are out their that believe the sun revolves around the earth till I just googled.
>>And I would stand in proud company with Sir Fred Hoyle,
" He argued that the primeval molecules from which life evolved on Earth had been transported from elsewhere in the universe. In itself this idea would not necessarily be rejected as absurd by the scientific community, but Hoyle had publicised a further argument that influenza epidemics were associated with the passage of the Earth through certain meteor streams, the particles of which conveyed the virus to Earth."
>>And I would stand in proud company with Sir Fred Hoyle, Max Born ...
Seems that ol' Max Born beleived in formulating theories where 99.9% was unobservable! Aren't you the hypocrite!