Again, it depends on which one is being used at the time.
"I'm not misrepresenting you, just trying to understand why you condone religious dogma being taught in science classes?"
Again, you are misrepresenting me. I have never condoned teaching religious dogma in science class. I merely point out that science is not equipped to answer the supernatural vs natural creation question. It is limited to naturalistic methodologies by definition.
I've asked you twice now to explain naturalism and explain how and what version is used in schools.
You have dodged me both times.
I have to therefore come to the conclusion that you are talking out of something other than your mouth.
>>Again, you are misrepresenting me. I have never condoned teaching religious dogma in science class. I merely point out that science is not equipped to answer the supernatural vs natural creation question. It is limited to naturalistic methodologies by definition.
Science has answered the supernatural questions many times. For example, one time the supernatural explanation was that angels carried the sun overhead each day. I don't think that even you still believe that supernatural explanation anymore.