>>No, this is a fundamental weakness of the 'scientific' requirement. 'Scientism' is limited to naturalism. Only naturalistic models are acceptable.
A fundemental strenght of science is that it does not stop with "The Earth is flat and the center of the Universe".
I see that you avoid the argument that a fundamental weakness of the 'scientific' requirement is that it *requires* a naturalistic answer.
You should avoid that argument because you have no answer for it. Better to try to shift the discussion away from that fact.