Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British Lord Stings Senators Rockefeller and Snowe: 'Uphold Free Speech or Resign'
breitbart ^ | Dec. 18, 2006 | PRNewswire

Posted on 12/19/2006 12:12:02 AM PST by gr8eman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: RedQuill

21 posted on 12/19/2006 2:56:10 AM PST by RobFromGa (I'm still optimistic about our future!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman
"Sen Snowe could not be reached for comment."


22 posted on 12/19/2006 3:18:30 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell

Yeah, but it's a close run thing...


23 posted on 12/19/2006 3:23:05 AM PST by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman
Another thread on the smackdown with some terrific links...

British Lord Stings Senators Rockefeller and Snowe: 'Uphold Free Speech or Resign'

24 posted on 12/19/2006 3:24:25 AM PST by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
Senator Inhoff had the nerve .... Repub from Oklahoma.

Why wont they allow debate on this? They would lose the debate.

They have the Soviet style of governing. If you can't win the war of Ideas, then imprison your intellectual competition. Worked for Stalin.
25 posted on 12/19/2006 5:25:32 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RedQuill

26 posted on 12/19/2006 5:48:19 AM PST by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman

Thank you, Lord Monckton, for getting it right. And now, if you would, a follow up letter to Senators McCain and Feingold please.


27 posted on 12/19/2006 5:53:15 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Prayers for our patriot brother, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub, now more than ever my FRiends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee

"Was there no American political figure with the courage to write something like this?"

No.

And this lack of political courage is in my opinion responsible for our recent losses in the House and Senate.

Having convictions is of no use unless one is willing to stand up for them.


28 posted on 12/19/2006 6:31:34 AM PST by EEDUDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: metesky

LOL!


30 posted on 12/19/2006 8:19:17 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Only liberals and RINOS can escape full speed through cracks that would challenge a cockroach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee

--Was there no American political figure with the courage to write something like this?--

Senator Inhofe. Perhaps not quite as eloquent as an English Lord, but effective nonetheless.


31 posted on 12/19/2006 8:32:50 AM PST by rfp1234 (Custom-built for Bill Clinton: the new Toyota Priapus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All; ohioWfan; Peach

Fancy that. This turned into a Bush bash thread.

I'm game.

You people are beyond ridiculous.

Why would the President know about R and S's letter to this British Lord?

If it was brought to his attention by someone, I trust he would let the arrogant, ill-informed Senators fight their own battles and get their noses bloodied by those whom they offended.

If Senator Inhofe commented on it, as someone said, that is much more appropriate, as these people are writing as U.S. Senators, not in any way connected to the WH or the Executive Branch.

Carry on, Mr. President.

Don't let those who engage in sheer idiocy get you down.





32 posted on 12/19/2006 8:34:37 AM PST by txrangerette ("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

Lives up to all my expectations. Bet she's got little "man-hands" too.


33 posted on 12/19/2006 9:22:45 AM PST by RedQuill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman

Sounds good. Anybody who has the guts to put Rockefeller in his place is alright by me. Just too bad they had to come from such a faraway place. Shows how spineless our country is when none of our own people can stand up to the likes of him. They are so dern afraid of the Rockefeller power, money and the like, that they all of a sudden become cowering little sheep just a whimpering away...


34 posted on 12/19/2006 9:39:15 AM PST by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee

Way to go!!

We all should writhe letters to WV and ME newspapers in this vain.

The earth cools and the earth warms.

prevent a wave from crashing to the shore or a sine wave from going up and down. Same thing

More Gasses were spewed out of MT ST Hellens than have ever come out of all the tailpipes in the the world ever combined!!!


35 posted on 12/19/2006 10:16:27 AM PST by CPT Clay (Drill ANWR, Personal Accounts NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
Was there no American political figure with the courage to write something like this?

There is one, though he was not responding to the same question about global warming.

"You have more censorship in the McCain-Feingold bill, which blocks the right of free speech about American campaigns than you have from the FBI closing down jihadists. We've already limited the 1st Amendment right of free speech by a set of rules that are stunningly absurd. In California, you can raise soft money to run negative commercials attacking your opponent through the state party and you cannot raise soft money to run a positive commercial on behalf of your own candidate. That's California state law. It's stunningly stupid and a clear infringement of free speech.

"So we've had a 30-year period of saying it's OK to infringe free speech as long as it's about politics. But now if you want to be a jihadist, and you want to go kill people, well who are we to say that's morally wrong? I think that's suicidal. I'm using the word deliberately. A country -- a Supreme Court justice once said 'The Constitution is not a suicide pact. This country has every right to defend itself, and you saw the same thing recently on this U.S. Airlines provocation, where you had six people go way out of their way to cause trouble, and then claim they were infringed upon. And I think, frankly, the President should invite that U.S. Airlines crew to the White House and thank them, because we ought to set a standard that if you're provocative about killing people, we're not going to show you any mercy.'"

-- Newt Gingrich, http://www.humanevents.com/winningthefuture.php?id=18533

36 posted on 12/19/2006 10:59:07 AM PST by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
Nope. Not one.
37 posted on 12/19/2006 11:01:07 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

Well, I haven't read the posts on this thread. It's been a few months since I've read poster comments on ANY thread, unless someone pings me to something in particular.

There is a growing group of ugly personalities who seem to try and outdo each other in ignorant and mean-spirited posts.

It's a shame that the forum has become what it has, but maybe it will change someday. In the interim, I'm just letting the Bush bashers have their little fun. It seems an awful lot of posters revel in their ignorance and stupid posts.


38 posted on 12/19/2006 11:17:34 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Thanks for replying. You don't have to read the posts. I don't blame you.

Just know that it started out as people mad that Senators Rockefeller and Snowe had sent a letter to a member of the British House of Lords who doesn't believe in global warming, and told him he should stop his efforts to convince people of his views, because they think he is just doing the bidding of EXXON MOBILE, and it quickly turned to a thread of the usual hostile suspects bashing President Bush because HE HAD NOT PUBLICLY CRITICIZED THESE SENATORS FOR DOING THAT.

I was asking what made them think he even knew about it, and even if he came to know, it would clearly not be his place to publicly criticize Senators but let them fight their own battles and get their come uppance from the person they sent the letter to (which they did, ha ha, the guy really let them have it).

And I started by telling them their bashing on this point was beyond ridiculous.




39 posted on 12/19/2006 11:45:52 AM PST by txrangerette ("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman
Lord Monckton, former policy adviser to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, writes: "You defy every tenet of democracy when you invite ExxonMobil to deny itself the right to provide information to senior elected and appointed government officials who disagree with your opinion."

Good for Lord Monckton!

40 posted on 12/19/2006 1:39:54 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson