1 posted on
12/18/2006 1:42:47 PM PST by
radar101
To: radar101
Chickens come home to roost for resister's rooters.
2 posted on
12/18/2006 1:43:49 PM PST by
radar101
(LIBERALS = Hypocrisy and Fantasy)
To: radar101
so the army wants her to testify that her article was the truth, and she has a problem with that?
3 posted on
12/18/2006 1:45:50 PM PST by
absolootezer0
(stop repeat offenders - don't re-elect them!)
To: radar101
"The ethical problem in this case, she said, is that she would be aiding the prosecution of one of the dissidents and war critics who regularly trust her to tell their stories to the public."
A dried up well isn't an ethical problem, honey. Glad you don't make your living interviewing child rapists. Idiot "journalists".
4 posted on
12/18/2006 1:49:34 PM PST by
L98Fiero
(The media is a self-licking ice-cream cone)
To: radar101
The most encouraging thing about this is that it looks like Lieutenant Wannabe is gonna get himself very thoroughly convicted by a court-martial, perhaps he can spend the next 20 years or so breaking rocks in Leavenworth. It's a pity we don't have punishment battalions for guys like him: let him be the point man in minefields and potential ambuscades.
6 posted on
12/18/2006 1:51:08 PM PST by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
To: radar101
Watada's going to spend some time at Leavenworth and it's appropriate that these two reporters who are sympathetic to him are going to help put him there.
10 posted on
12/18/2006 1:56:30 PM PST by
jazusamo
(http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKillers/DefendOurMarines.htm)
To: radar101
Throw these reporters in jail if they do not comply with the law. A press pass should NEVER be treated as some sort of "Get Out of Jail Free" card that entitles the holder to be complicit in criminal activity.
The same should apply to reporters who do not identify anonymous leakers in other government documents.
13 posted on
12/18/2006 2:00:17 PM PST by
pnh102
To: radar101
Watada, 28, faces a court-martial in February at Fort Lewis, Wash., where he is based. He is charged with missing a troop movement -- because he refused to deploy
The main issue, Seitz said, is "whether he had First Amendment rights to say what he did.'
What's First Amendment rights have to do with disobeying and order to deploy with his unit? Was he in the military or wasn't he ???
15 posted on
12/18/2006 2:03:10 PM PST by
Obie Wan
To: radar101
"The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth..."
We'll leave off the last part, lest you choke, Ms. Olson.
18 posted on
12/18/2006 2:10:27 PM PST by
grobdriver
(Let the embeds check the bodies!)
To: radar101
Watada used his Military ID photo for the papers in Honolulu. The guy is a rock star over there and shoots his mouth in a big way.
21 posted on
12/18/2006 2:19:56 PM PST by
armymarinemom
(My sons freed Iraqi and Afghan Honor Roll students.)
To: radar101
Well if the press quoted him it must be true. Would the press lie to us and make up stuff just to help with a story?
Come on.
Shoot him.
22 posted on
12/18/2006 2:23:07 PM PST by
PeteB570
(Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
To: radar101
25 posted on
12/18/2006 2:28:21 PM PST by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: radar101
"The ethical problem in this case, she said, is that she would be aiding the prosecution of one of the dissidents and war critics who regularly trust her to tell their stories to the public."
DISSIDENTS??? Human Rights Watch is going to release a report on the persecution of political dissidents in America, I'm sure. Boy, this is just like the Soviet Union!
37 posted on
12/18/2006 3:08:40 PM PST by
james500
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson