Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rembrandt_fan; RussP
Creationists, on the other hand, act as if the Bible was designed as a science textbook, which it most emphatically isn't.

We keep hearing that accusation all the time and I don't know ANY that make that claim. Could you provide us with some examples of those who have stated that? And could you then explain why you make a blanket statement about all creationists based on your perception of what some have allegedly said?

35 posted on 12/18/2006 9:23:23 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
You wrote, "We keep hearing that accusation all the time..."

And you will keep hearing it, since Creationism--as a movement, as a set of ideas--is a literal interpretation of the creation story in the Book of Genesis. Any time any Creationist claims that the world was made in literally six days, then that person is claiming the Bible as a source of scientific authority. There are, of course, other, more scientifically mainstream arguments against evolution that do not rely upon interpretation of Biblical texts, but that isn't what we're talking about when we're talking about Creationism, is it?
43 posted on 12/18/2006 9:37:13 AM PST by Rembrandt_fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson