British Lord Stings Senators Rockefeller and Snowe: 'Uphold Free Speech or Resign'

http://www.amtdrt.inlumen.com/bin/story?StoryId=CryyGubWbmZuYCdeXnJy ^ | 12/18/06 | PR Newswire

[FreedomPoster]

That's a great link; thanks for the resource. Bookmarked and pdf saved locally.

[Lord Basil]

I'd settle for an ounce of intelligence.

[JCEccles]

Lord Monckton's Churchillian reproof continues, "You acknowledge the effectiveness of the climate sceptics. In so doing, you pay a compliment to the courage of those free-thinking scientists who continue to research climate change independently despite the likelihood of refusal of publication in journals that have taken preconceived positions; the hate mail and vilification from ignorant environmentalists; and the threat of loss of tenure in institutions of learning which no longer make any pretence to uphold or cherish academic freedom."

The same could be said about the current debate over Darwinism.

When science becomes religion, you get such things as envirowhackos and Darwin dweebs stifling all criticism and debate.

[neverhillorat]

Please, call it what it is, global warming is just another way to talk about the weather

[Unicorn]

He's just saying what Pres. Bush does'nt have the balls to say.

[Unicorn]

He's just saying what Pres. Bush does'nt have the balls to say.

[CedarDave]

BUMP!!

[Marysecretary]

What nerve these senators have. Nothing like free speech, unless it's someone you don't agree with. Arghhhhhhhhhhhh.

[Publius6961]

BUMP!

[Publius6961]

Following that link, within the PDF is the following tatement:

Al Gore, who was Vice-President when the Senate declared 97-0 that it would not ratify any treaty that did not bind fast-growing, heavily-polluting nations such as China, India, Indonesia and Brazil because without them no action by the West would make any difference, wrote a reply to my article saying that I should not be discussing these matters in the Press. He said I should rely on peer-reviewed research in journals such as Science, Nature and Geophysical Research Letters. Within 12 hours, I had published a 24-page refutation of his scientifically-inaccurate article, citing more than 60 references in learned journals. Twenty-five of the citations were from the three journals he mentioned.

Have you been able to locate the 24-page refutation to which he refers?

[mewzilla]

BTTT.

[kalee]

Well said, Lord Monckton.

[denydenydeny]

Primary challenge, please.