Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Not So Fast -- Why Barack Obama may not run.
The Wall Street Journal ^ | December 17, 2006 | John Fund

Posted on 12/18/2006 12:55:03 AM PST by Zakeet

Just about everybody seems convinced that Sen. Barack Obama is going to run for president. The Chicago Sun-Times, his hometown paper, is writing as if his candidacy is an established fact.

[Snip]

Time out. Let's look at the 1 in 5 chance that even his own advisers say he won't run.

[Snip]

Left unspoken is the big reason why so many Democrats are swooning over the newcomer. It's the nagging belief that the country isn't ready to elect Hillary Clinton. "If she is the nominee, voters will be asked to select another Clinton, after having had a Bush in the White House, preceded by a Clinton, preceded by the first President Bush," one Democratic consultant observes. "Against her, most Republicans would look like a fresh face and with less baggage."

[Snip]

Only for so long will Mr. Obama's sparkling personality help him avoid troubling questions out his ideological record. The fact that he originally opposed the war in Iraq would help him with primary voters, but it's unclear how many Democrats want to plump for someone who, according to National Journal, has a more liberal voting record than Hillary Clinton. Last year Mr. Obama had a perfect 100% voting record from both the Americans for Democratic Action and the AFL-CIO.

His record as a state legislator is even more liberal. In 1996, he spoke out against the Defense of Marriage Act, which the Senate approved 85-14 and Mr. Clinton signed into law. He twice voted "present" on a bill to ban partial-birth abortions came up. In 1999 he was the only state senator to oppose a law that prohibited early prison release for sex offenders. Is anyone naive enough to believe Mrs. Clinton wouldn't use those positions as evidence that he couldn't win?

(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008election; iraqosama; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Zakeet

"Democrats want to plump for someone who, according to National Journal, has a more liberal voting record than Hillary Clinton."

I don't know why they just don't change the name of their party to Libocrats.


21 posted on 12/18/2006 4:40:17 AM PST by MagnoliaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
It seems to me that the Republicans are already giving up on the 2008 election and setting their sights for 2016.

Did you arrive at that conclusion because the GOP plans on running Bob Dole again?

22 posted on 12/18/2006 4:40:25 AM PST by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sterm26

" The R's need to find a candidate quick."

I'd rather take our time and find the right one. Two years is a long time.


23 posted on 12/18/2006 5:06:11 AM PST by Humble Servant (Keep it simple - do what's right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson