Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duke R*pe Case All Too Common
CommonVoice.com ^ | December 17, 2006 | Jim Kouri

Posted on 12/17/2006 6:10:02 PM PST by WL-law

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: WL-law
To be considered false one or more of the following criteria had to be met: the victim unequivocally admitted to the false allegation, indicated deception in a polygraph test, and provided a plausible recantation.

I'd like to see what the results would be if they left out polygraph tests as a a criteria. They are notoriously unreliable.

41 posted on 12/17/2006 7:14:12 PM PST by murdoog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spinestein
The accuser is just a crazy fool. Prosecuting her is pointless.

Actually, it serves two very important functions: 1) to dissuade other women from making similar false accusations, many of which end up utterly destroying innocent people's lives; 2) to keep the criminal bitch in question from doing it again.

As I mentioned earlier, the appropriate penalty for filing false rape charges should be life in prison.

42 posted on 12/17/2006 7:15:08 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: spinestein

I dont agree. She may be a fool,in fact I believe she is. However she has ruined the lives of these young men and she deserves punishment.

She deserves harsh punishment IMO. When you bring serious false charges against someone you should get the punishment they would get if the charges were proven.

She is no more fool than Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton who raced each other seeing which could condemn these white boys the quickest.


43 posted on 12/17/2006 7:16:05 PM PST by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Buddy B

What was the 'old saying of years gone by?--
"Confucious say--"no such thing as rape"--"woman run faster with dress up than man with pants down"


44 posted on 12/17/2006 7:17:40 PM PST by cmotormac44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
There's an error in the first paragraph, I fixed it:

"n another twist in an already questionable criminal case, DNA testing in the infamous Duke lacrosse r*pe case found no genetic material from any of the accused males on the woman's body or on her clothing, but analysts found DNA from several unknown male on in the accuser's body."

45 posted on 12/17/2006 7:19:11 PM PST by Rb ver. 2.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WL-law

This needs its own "P*ng L*st"


46 posted on 12/17/2006 7:21:42 PM PST by freedomlover (Sorry, a tagline occurred. The tagline has been logged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Especially since she made a similar rape allegation about 10 years ago.


47 posted on 12/17/2006 7:22:12 PM PST by Sue Perkick (Just a water spider on the pond of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: jdm; TOneocon
Hil had a "face lift" sometime during Billzo's second term ~ this is probably shortly after getting off the bandages.

However, she did not get a tummy-tuck, breast enhancement, or thigh reduction.

48 posted on 12/17/2006 7:56:49 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: murdoog

You need go no further than an earlier medical diagnosis of bipolar disorder. She can say just about anything she wants penalty free as a consequence.


49 posted on 12/17/2006 7:58:38 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: freedomlover

> This needs its own "P*ng L*st" <


Pong lost? As in Chinese table tennis?

Or pung lust? Hope not, because that seems a bit risque!


50 posted on 12/17/2006 8:15:21 PM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

"My G*od...it's f*ll of st*rs!"


51 posted on 12/17/2006 10:53:02 PM PST by newzjunkey (Enjoy your retirement, Rummy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

I am not a pervert, but, alas, I know some. Poor buggers, but you don't want them around you or your children. Can't help themselves.


52 posted on 12/18/2006 7:41:27 PM PST by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy!" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jdm

It's jsut you. A hot Hillary!? Only when she's in Hell.


53 posted on 02/02/2007 2:03:27 PM PST by chesley ("Socialism" - compassion for those that don't have any.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson