1 posted on
12/16/2006 5:02:06 PM PST by
PRePublic
To: PRePublic
OK article, but VDH certainly has nothing to worry about from this quater.
To: PRePublic
Nobody gets it. Some do, but not enough. I've taken my campaign "on the road" by registering at local forums around the country. I spent the past week at a Grand Rapids forum debating and providing information. I avoid speaking about "Muslims," and I do not use or react to hate speech or negative terminology. Rather, I focus on the ideology itself. I would suggest that anyone who cares about this issue do the same. If you are successful in reaching only one or two individuals, you have made a difference.
3 posted on
12/16/2006 5:27:37 PM PST by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: PRePublic
The plan is to conquer us through the use of our freedoms - and the ACLU is helping them every step of the way.
4 posted on
12/16/2006 5:42:48 PM PST by
BW2221
To: PRePublic
Yes, I agree. However, we have some allies among the Saudis, which is why they are going to be attacked from the within and without very shortly before the decade is out.
5 posted on
12/16/2006 5:48:35 PM PST by
rjp2005
(Lord have mercy on us)
To: PRePublic
I think some people get it, I don't think the MSM gets it, or if they do, they don't want to say it.
Exception to that would be Glenn Beck...he gets it, and he says it.
8 posted on
12/16/2006 6:04:01 PM PST by
dawn53
To: PRePublic
Which makes Bush's strategy of a democratic Iraq the huge roadblock to that caliphate.
Which is why the strategy is brilliant.
The rats, by opposing Bush on purely political grounds, are actually promoting our demise.
11 posted on
12/16/2006 6:20:50 PM PST by
smoketree
(the insanity, the lunacy these days)
To: PRePublic
An excellent explanation was written by Hillaire Belloc in 1936 - he predicted a possible resurgence of Islam.It is worth reading.
To: PRePublic
The answer:
21 posted on
12/16/2006 7:19:30 PM PST by
Cobra64
(Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
To: PRePublic
The reason no one gets it is because of the wussie words being used, (jihad, terrorist, sectarian violence, etc.) Start substituting the word "genocide".
23 posted on
12/17/2006 2:41:50 AM PST by
tkathy
(Sectarian violence? Or genocidal racists? Which is a better description of islamists?)
To: PRePublic
The ability to constitute an object does not imply in any way that the object therefore has existence.
26 posted on
12/17/2006 9:54:07 AM PST by
RightWhale
(RTRA DLQS GSCW)
To: PRePublic
If the Muslims were to win domination over the world what would they do?
Arab peoples have advanced almost not at all in the past 2000 years. The world could not be ran by prayers five times a day or by screaming fundamentalist nonsense. Nowhere have Arabs demonstrated that they can even run a backward country such as the ones they live in, much less the modern world.
A highly technological world will not sustain itself. It needs constant updating and fine tuning. How coujld Arabs, who can't even make a paper clip do this?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson