Here in IL, I have stopped listening to the local news. The coverage of Obama is annoying. Sadly it is having an effect. People, I know who don't follow politics at all, think Obama would make a great President because he is a Freshman Senator and untainted by Congressional scnadal. Stupid, yes. But that's how indies think. Mormon Mitt arguably accomplished more than Obama.
I believe you. I have read and heard too many people say that his inexperience is a plus! We're talking Commander-in-Chief, Chief Executive, and his inexperience is a plus?
What do you mean arguably? Mitt turned the 2002 Olympics from a scandal-ridden event swirling down the johnny flusher to the most successful winter olympics in history and is a self-made multi-millionaire.
I yet haven't decided whether he is the best candidate out there, but he's certainly better than the front runners mentioned so far-- McCain, Guilani and Gingrich. He's the only one of the quartet who's managed to control his zipper; the only polygamist who doesn't polyg among a group of monogamists who don't monog.
Romney's pre-elective office resume is almost as long as George Bush Sr. Obama's resume has two such entries-- community activist and clever lawyer . . . of course the shortfall is more than made up in the minds of the enemedia because his sperm donor was a black Muslim.