Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. firm to build Chinese nuke reactors (Westinghouse Electric Co.)
AP on Yahoo ^ | 12/15/06 | Elaine Kurtenbach - ap

Posted on 12/15/2006 11:14:27 PM PST by NormsRevenge

BEIJING - China and the United States on Saturday signed an agreement that paves the way for Westinghouse Electric Co. to build four civilian nuclear reactors in China, a multibillion dollar deal.

The memorandum of understanding was signed by China's Minister for the National Development and Reform Commission Ma Kai and U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman.

Stephen Tritch, Westinghouse's president and CEO, said the details of the contract have yet to be finalized but that it was a multibillion dollar deal. He said the company want the plants up and running by 2013.

Westinghouse, which was acquired by Japan's Toshiba Corp. earlier this year from British Nuclear Fuels PLC, had been vying with the French nuclear group AREVA and Russia's AtomStroyExport to win the lucrative contract for building facilities at Sanmen, in the eastern province of Zhejiang, and at Yangjiang in southern China's Guangdong province.

China is building scores of new nuclear power plants, seeking the latest technology from industry leaders while working to shore up its own expertise.

"This is an exciting day for the U.S. nuclear industry," Bodman said at the ceremony. "It is an example that if we work together we can advance not only our trade relations but also our common goal of energy security."

Asia offers the promise of a bonanza for American companies such as Westinghouse and General Electric Co. which already have a strong presence in the region. Westinghouse has helped build 14 nuclear plants in South Korea and provided technology for almost half of Japan's 55 nuclear units. GE, meanwhile, has helped build 36 reactors in Japan, India and Taiwan.

Eighteen reactors — about 70 percent of the world's total under construction — are going up in Asia, and another 77 are planned or proposed, according to the Nuclear Energy Institute, an industry advocacy group based in Washington, D.C.

The deal was signed on the sidelines of a meeting of five major oil importing nations hosted by China.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chinese; nuclearfuelcycle; nukereactors; powerplants; westinghouse

1 posted on 12/15/2006 11:14:29 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

China is building scores of new nuclear power plants, seeking the latest technology from industry leaders while working to shore up its own expertise.

"This is an exciting day for the U.S. nuclear industry," Bodman said at the ceremony. "It is an example that if we work together we can advance not only our trade relations but also our common goal of energy security."

---

Meanwhile, here in the US, energy security is nothing more than a hollow buzzword.


2 posted on 12/15/2006 11:15:32 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... Merry Something PC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

And as part of this "deal" do we get the HUGE tonage of high level, lethal nuke waste to store in our homeland?

I am so tired of the US being the world waste basket.


3 posted on 12/15/2006 11:20:45 PM PST by ASOC (The phrase "What if" or "If only" are for children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

BOHICA


4 posted on 12/15/2006 11:21:21 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Why can't Republicans stand up to Democrats like they do to terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The positive side is that the billions of dollars for these facilities will help offset some of the trade deficit from vast Chinese imports into the U.S. Also, at least until they reverse engineer the technology, the PRC will be dependent on GE for upgrades, spare parts, fuel rods, etc.


5 posted on 12/15/2006 11:33:04 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASOC
do we get the HUGE tonage of high level, lethal nuke waste to store in our homeland?

fyi, the high level waste could fit in a couple of barns. now the low level waste is a large volume.

6 posted on 12/15/2006 11:54:08 PM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
I used "tonage" by choice.

My gripe on the waste -- if Jesus had a reactor back in his day, the waste would still be lethal to unprotected humans today. I am assuming a half life of key TRU of 24,000 years - or more.


From our friends at the National Safety Council:

There are five general categories of radioactive waste:

spent nuclear fuel from nuclear reactors and high-level waste from reprocessing spent nuclear fuel;

transuranic waste, resulting mainly as by-products from defense programs;

uranium mill tailings, from the mining and milling of uranium ore;

low-level waste, from contaminated industrial or research waste; and

naturally occurring radioactive materials. Mixed waste is waste that contains both radioactive components and other hazardous components.

Transuranic, or TRU, waste generally consists of protective clothing, tools, glassware, equipment, soils, and sludge contaminated with manmade radioisotopes heavier than uranium. (The term transuranic is derived from “trans,” meaning beyond, and “uranic,” which refers to uranium; thus, transuranic elements are beyond or “heavier” than uranium on the periodic table of the elements.) These elements include plutonium, neptunium, americium, curium, and californium.

Transuranic waste is produced during nuclear fuel assembly; during nuclear weapons research, production, and cleanup; and as a result of reprocessing spent nuclear fuel.

They get the electricity, they get the waste.

7 posted on 12/16/2006 12:17:47 AM PST by ASOC (The phrase "What if" or "If only" are for children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
The positive side is that the billions of dollars for these facilities will help offset some of the trade deficit from vast Chinese imports into the U.S. Also, at least until they reverse engineer the technology, the PRC will be dependent on GE for upgrades, spare parts, fuel rods, etc.

You would think so, but the last time that I looked at this deal, the U.S. taxpayer was financing it via the federal Ex-Im Bank (http://www.exim.gov/).

I don't know if that has changed, but the lead story at Ex-Im today is "Export-Import Banks of United States and China Announce Agreement to Increase Sales of U.S.-Financed Exports to China".

8 posted on 12/16/2006 5:04:06 AM PST by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Last I heard, China was going to be building literally hundreds of pebble-bed reactors, as safe, inexpensive energy for their rural areas.

I gather the way p-b reactors work is by making ceramic balls with radioactive material in them. Then you put them in a single layer on an egg-crate type surface, so they are a given distance apart. They need no controls, and produce a given amount of heat for a given length of time. When the nuclear material in the balls has expired, you just open the floor and dump the balls down a deep shaft for disposal.

It doesn't produce as much energy as a conventional reactor, but it is a lot cheaper and cleaner.


9 posted on 12/16/2006 6:25:49 AM PST by Popocatapetl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

Thanks for the news and the link.


10 posted on 12/18/2006 2:05:27 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee (Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson