[cyn]

// Morris' arguments are so flawed that I must wonder if the toe-sucker is a stealth clinton suckup. //

I have had the same concerns about Morris. He's not a conservative. Did he really see the error of his ways, or did he just get his feelings hurt?

[Mia T]

Morris is, above all else, a self-promoter. He says 9/11 changed him. He also says he repeatedly warned the clintons about terrorism, claiming to have [rightly] identified fighting terrorism as THE policy that would have produced the legacy clinton is always desperately seeking [but, of course, will never achieve].

KILL BILL: AN UNINTENDED APPRAISAL OF THE CLINTON YEARS?
'KILL BILL'
THE CLINTON-FOLEY NEXUS: A THEORY
by Mia T, 10.05.06

 

I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t


by Mia T, 11.11.05

This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.

Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.

According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.

Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.

If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.

READ MORE

WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?

by Mia T, 8.18.05

thanx to jla and Wolverine for the audio



CLINTON: 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
(+ Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)





UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS
"We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."