Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Silverback

"The presence of a religious display on government property means exactly diddly unless other religions are being excluded."

You're an intelligent man, Silverback, but if you can't see that government sponsored religious displays don't violate the establishment clause, I can't help you.


29 posted on 12/18/2006 6:45:10 AM PST by gcruse (http://garycruse.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: gcruse
You're an intelligent man, Silverback,

Thanks, back at you. As I'm sure you've heard many times, the establishment clause is designed to prevent the government from forming a state church.

Take the folks in Madison, Wisconsin, whos surprisingly have gotten this right. They have displays from all comers in the Capitol, including a display from the Freedom From Religion Foundation declaring an atheist creed. How are they establishing a state relgion when the Christians have a display declaring their belief that the Messiah has come, the Jews have a display that celebrates Hanukkah (and implies that the baby the Christians laud was no Messiah) and the atheists are one the other side of the room with a sign that says there is no God, much less a Messiah? What is the government establishing there?

30 posted on 12/18/2006 6:58:57 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (We need to crush the Iraq Study Group like we crushed Harriet Miers. Let fly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson