Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin

Is there a specific criminal penalty attached to that law, or is it just the usual disclosure requirement that results in the evidence being tossed if its not disclosed?


150 posted on 12/15/2006 6:15:25 PM PST by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: ArmstedFragg

I am not familiar with the consequences, but I know we are what is called an "open case file" state, which means he is REQUIRED to give the defense whatever he has "in a timely manner."

Not only did he not give it to them, the defense had to get the judge to ORDER him to give the results; and he never did -- he stuck it in a "document drop" in October, FGS!

Now, it doesn't take a legal genius to figure out he got Meehan to leave out the results so that he wouldn't have a WRITTEN report to hand over to the defense AND he wouldn't have any exculpatory evidence to give to the Grand Jury.

Keep in mind that by April 28th, the date the second tests were given to him, he KNEW positively that Seligmann, Finnery, and Evans were 100 percent excluded.

However, this being NC and our crappy laws, I'm sure the Democratic legislature wrote in some loophole to excuse this action.

I am FUMING.


153 posted on 12/15/2006 6:21:16 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson