Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vicomte13
But your 90 year old grandmother, and all the 90-year old grandmothers of history, did not live in a world of massive abortion or birth control, where the future was being literally snuffed out.

She's still alive, she lived through all of it.

And they were destroyed by the Germans in two world wars as a result.

Population wasn't the reason for their loss. It was superior German tactics. No matter how many people France could have had, the stupidity of their military tactics would have rendered them useless in the initial invasions of both wars.

278 posted on 12/19/2006 6:02:32 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat

Umm, hoss, France STOPPED the German invasion in World War I. Stopped it cold. That's why the Germans went into trench lines and tried to win by attrition (against a country with only half the population of Germany) what they couldn't win outright on the field.

Yes, in World War II the French were totally outmaneuvered, and lost as a result. But there was much more to that. Had the French any spirit to really fight the Germans in World War II, the result could have been quite different. Only Paris? SO WHAT. And fight on. Germany would have had a very difficult time actually subduing and occupying all of France had the French army remained in the field, fallen back, and continued to fight. They didn' The national morale failed completely, and that was BECAUSE OF the mass death of World War I. In World War I the French Army STOPPED the Schlieffen Plan. The German invasion FAILED. But France was so outnumbered that she could not win a war of attrition without British, and later American, help. The population differential was the key to the balance of power between Germany and France in World War I. German tactics were not appreciably superior, as the French DID stop the Germans, cold, and held them, as the two sides bled each other to death. With only half the people, France was going to bleed to death faster, and was so ravaged that the will to do it again, a scant 20 years later, with a reduced next-generation thanks to the war dead from the last one, was not there.

Population was the key, and France paid dearly in the 20th Century for zero population growth in the 19th.

Suppose, instead, that France had grown in the same proportions as the rest of Europe. The French would have outnumbered the Germans, and the Germans would not have dared attack them in the first place in 1914, let alone 1870.

Most of European history, during the long periods from the Middle Ages onward when France was the super-populous country, were the histories of various coalitions to stop the relentless expansion of the French Kingdom pressing on its borders. When the birth rate plummetted after the Revolution and the Napoleonic wars, France ceased to be the pressing threat, and it was the rising, rapidly expanding population of Germany that became the largest, and the menace to the peace.

Demography is destiny.


279 posted on 12/19/2006 10:32:21 AM PST by Vicomte13 (Aure entuluva.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson