[EnochPowellWasRight]

"Since 1977? The IRA, for one. "

That's not "international terrorism".

"It shows. "

That I'd rather not have to fight a massive war? Of course I wouldn't. Unfortunately, the history of the 30s is being repeated.

"I'm didn't claim that all Nazi party members committed murder. Those who didn't commit crimes were not jailed after the war. You want to imprison every American Muslim, even those who didn't commit crimes. "

Actually, quite a few Nazi officials were just shot after the war. I want to INTERN Muslims - particularly those with connections to Saudi mosques.

"You know, it it walks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck, and it's a plan to send innocent Americans to concentration camps based on nothing more than their religious and/or ethnic background, then ... "

That would be what nations do during a war. In this case, that would be based on their divided allegiance.

"Probably a few. Since McVeigh killed 168 innocent Americans, don't you think that's a few too many?"

Muslim terrorists have killed thousands of Americans and many more non-Muslims are "wrong kind of" Muslims since this Islamist resurgence in the 60s. Not comparable, but you know that. At least one Congressman believes that McVeigh had Muslim terrorist contacts....

[zimdog]

That's not "international terrorism".

Interesting. What definitions are you using for "international" and "terrorism"?

That would be what nations do during a war. In this case, that would be based on their divided allegiance.

What is Zalmay Khalilzad's "divided allegiance"?

At least one Congressman believes that McVeigh had Muslim terrorist contacts....

Of course, locking up all the Muslims in America would not keep McVeigh et al off the streets. You aren't targeting people with terrorist connections. You are targeting Muslims. Including innocent ones.