That's not what you said in Post #132: "Unpalatable as he [Allende] may have been, he was the country's legitimate president."
You're confusing a question about Allende's lack of legitimacy with a question about the legitimacy of Pinchet's coup.
The only confusion here is your own, as this discussion began when you described Allende as Chile's "legitimate president." I've already indicated why he was not with little to no substantive answer from you, only your usual word games.
You pointed out that his legitimacy was challenged, but you have yet to detail the constitutionally defined (that is to say legitimate) actions taken to strip him of his title.