Which is what I did as well.
Back to tu quoque I see.
Nothing of the sort. I was merely stating a fact. And whether Hitler himself was a neo-Pagan or not doesn't change the fact that the men on the front lines mostly belonged to Christian and Heretic churches.
Knowing that Husseini himself was not a general and thus did not personally command any divisions, you intended to corner me into answering in the negative at which point you could dishonestly dismiss the significant mahometan support for the Reich.
I asked a straightforward question. You gave a dishonest answer. Don't pretend that you know my intentions in asking the question better than I do.
That site appears to be a letter to the editor of a small West African newspaper. It does not rise to the level of a reliable source, so barring something more specific I remain skeptical.
An interpretation that reveals your intellectual laziness. Africultures is actually a respected international magazine of African culture and history. You can remain as skeptical as you want, but you've demonstrated time and time again that your skepticism is not necessarily rooted in fact.
And while you're searching I'll also point out that west african does not necessarily = muslim. The region as a whole large mahometan and Christian populations, as well as dozens of lesser voodoo and animist religions. Any number you produce should accordingly account for these distinctions within the troop population as well, rather than attempting to pass off all african FFL troops as muslims.
Perhaps if you had read my post...
No, you asked a loaded question. And you expected to get away with it. But you didn't, and instead it blew up in your face. So now you're getting all pissy about it. It's funny how one thing leads to another like that.
Africultures is actually a respected international magazine of African culture and history.
And yet the best you can produce from it is a letter to the editor?