Skip to comments.
McCain Inc.? (The New Republican Hope?)
Washington Post ^
| 14 December 2006
| Robert D. Novak
Posted on 12/14/2006 7:54:50 AM PST by shrinkermd
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-124 next last
I am biting my tongue and saying nothing while awaiting to see what happens.
To: shrinkermd
The media only wants McCain as a candidate so they can beat him up with "mental instability and mellanoma", said Hugh Hewitt.
I agree .. and I'm already fed up with having this idiot constantly shoved down my throat.
2
posted on
12/14/2006 7:57:13 AM PST
by
CyberAnt
(Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
To: shrinkermd; All
3
posted on
12/14/2006 7:57:28 AM PST
by
areafiftyone
(Politicians Are Like Diapers - Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason)
To: shrinkermd
He has the most money, the name recognition and it is heartening to see that he is surrounding himself with GOP senators --- which might give him pause about going third party should he not win the nomination.
4
posted on
12/14/2006 7:59:00 AM PST
by
onyx
(Phillip Rivers, LT and the San Diego Chargers! WOO-HOO!)
To: CyberAnt
The media only wants McCain as a candidate so they can beat him up with "mental instability and mellanoma"....
-----
Well, they want him because he is NOT a conservative. And they know he CAN beat Hitlery...God help us.
5
posted on
12/14/2006 7:59:52 AM PST
by
EagleUSA
To: shrinkermd
Everyone loves McCain, except bloggers and talk radio. Probably because bloggers and talk radio love the first ammendment.
He'll probably be the nominee and he'll also be the last "Old Media" nominee. Republicans are behind the curve.
6
posted on
12/14/2006 8:00:18 AM PST
by
NeoCaveman
(Where is my Reagan, Don't say it's John McCain. Where have all the conservatives gone? - P.Shanklin)
To: shrinkermd
Please....We must all get on either the Rudy or McLame bandwagon, and we must do it quickly. We Americans must finish the job of destroying America, and elect a Rudy or McLame. It's the wrong thing to do, but who cares?
7
posted on
12/14/2006 8:01:31 AM PST
by
From One - Many
(Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
To: shrinkermd
What does the Inc. stand for?....... Incompetent?
8
posted on
12/14/2006 8:02:05 AM PST
by
Kimmers
To: CyberAnt
"I'm already fed up with having this idiot constantly shoved down my throat." I second that. No way will I vote for that idiot, no matter what the consequences are.
To: shrinkermd
I used to say I would never vote for McCain, but I was wrong.
If it comes down to a choice between McCain and Hillary or Obama, I will vote for McCain.
It is sad that it has come to this, and McCain is partly to blame for the current dismal state of the GOP, but an election is a choice between the lesser of two evils.
It can't be emphasized enough: an election is a choice between the lesser of two evils.
An election is always a choice between the lesser of two evils.
10
posted on
12/14/2006 8:04:39 AM PST
by
TSchmereL
("Rust but terrify.")
To: TSchmereL
Yes, I think I am in the same spot. If it is a choice between a RAT and McCain, I will not only vote but support McCain.
To: TSchmereL
" An election is always a choice between the lesser of two evils." Or you can just stay home and enjoy life, ignore all the election charades.
To: shrinkermd

The GOP will be handing the Presidency to her heinous, Hitlery on a silver platter, if they offer up McCain as their 2008 candidate.
13
posted on
12/14/2006 8:06:41 AM PST
by
OB1kNOb
(This is no time for bleeding hearts, pacifists, and appeasers to prevail in free world opinion.)
To: shrinkermd
If it is McCain, then I will vote write in my preferred primary candidate anyway.
I will not vote for McCain in the primaries or the general.
14
posted on
12/14/2006 8:07:00 AM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
To: Nathan Zachary
I also oppose the nomination of McCain, but if it comes down to a choice between McCain and Hillary or Obama, you will vote for McCain?
It seems very unwise.
15
posted on
12/14/2006 8:07:14 AM PST
by
TSchmereL
("Rust but terrify.")
To: OB1kNOb
Just another appeasement weasel.
To: TSchmereL
An election is always a choice between the lesser of two evils.Either way one gets evil.
17
posted on
12/14/2006 8:08:54 AM PST
by
OB1kNOb
(This is no time for bleeding hearts, pacifists, and appeasers to prevail in free world opinion.)
To: TSchmereL
0
It can't be emphasized enough: an election is a choice between the lesser of two evils.The lesser of two evils is still an evil. We must press upon our party to give us candidates for whom we would be proud to vote for (like Reagan) instead of candidates we hold our noses over while voting for them.
To: From One - Many
We Americans must finish the job of destroying America, and elect a Rudy or McLame. It's the wrong thing to do, but who cares?
You're right. As long as we get a GOP president, it doesn't matter what the result will be.
To: Nathan Zachary
By not voting, you are electing the Democrat candidate.
20
posted on
12/14/2006 8:09:21 AM PST
by
TSchmereL
("Rust but terrify.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-124 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson