To: abb
From WRAL:
A defense attorney tells WRAL that a test taken at the hospital showed that she was not pregnant at the time of the party and that she was given emergency contraception commonly referred to as the morning-after pill.
471 posted on
12/14/2006 5:51:41 PM PST by
Howlin
To: Howlin
A defense attorney tells WRAL that a test taken at the hospital showed that she was not pregnant at the time of the party and that she was given emergency contraception commonly referred to as the morning-after pill. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm................
This case just keeps getting more bizarre.
477 posted on
12/14/2006 6:06:01 PM PST by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: Howlin
How is that possible, since Greta said that this baby was born NINE MONTHS after the supposed rape?
To: Howlin
OMG!!! I can't get over this....
Is the hearing going to be televised?? Anyone know?
486 posted on
12/14/2006 6:25:53 PM PST by
sissyjane
(Don't be stuck on stupid!)
To: Howlin
Backtracking the date, if the child was actually born on 12/13 or 12/14, actually puts conception after the party, but not real far beyond it - about a week. Further, third, fourth and so on births tend to come a little early, which would move the date forward, not back to the 13th-14th of March.
701 posted on
12/15/2006 2:10:47 AM PST by
Jezebelle
(Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson