Thanks. I assume you will post the motion if it appears somewhere. It is unclear whether the reporter has read the motion to determine whether there is anything even 1/10 as explosive as showed up yesterday.
Here's the motion - http://www.newsobserver.com/content/news/story_graphics/20061214_motion.pdf
It may not be quite as "explosive" as yesterday's motion, but it is very substantive and could lead to an early ending of the criminal cases.