Excellent summary and a compelling set of inferences. Are these inferences enough to get Nifong presumptively thrown off the case, since he could be potentially be cross-examined as to the "objectivity" of the benign and minimal DNA evidence that links to the 3 young men in this case?
Thanks.
It all depends on how much the people of NC push the gov, the AG, the state bar, and the feds to actually do something.
As an addendum, another poster reports that the reason the defense got this information is not because the October discovery showed the complete report, but rather because it showed only the final report of 5/12 which was just a summary indicating no match to the lax boys. It did not state that the DNA of five other men were found, and that is the crux of the entire issue. The defense then filed a motion to compel DNA Security and Nifong to produce the full report. That report was issued, and hence the motion filed today is now before the court.