Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: highball

Two years later, some folks are still counting chads.

There was a time and a place when DI could have testified, but they chickened out. They demanded, as witnesses, the right to have attorneys present. Since the appearance of perjury was an issue in the findings, they were no doubt wise not to testify.


80 posted on 12/12/2006 12:56:38 PM PST by js1138 (The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: js1138

And just as well - the defense perjured itself enough even without them.


81 posted on 12/12/2006 1:01:11 PM PST by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson