This is nothing unusual. The cases and analysis are what they are, regardless of who wrote them. There are any number of criminal appellate opinions that I am familiar with that are taken verbatim from the prosecution briefs.
Nice excuse-making there mak.
You'll have lots of company soon though as the anti-creationist Freepers will be showing up for 400 + posts thread.
We know. LOL!
This is nothing unusual. The cases and analysis are what they are, regardless of who wrote them. There are any number of criminal appellate opinions that I am familiar with that are taken verbatim from the prosecution briefs.
Exactly.
It should come as no surprise that the Discovery Institute is as dishonest about the law as they are about their own "research."