To: highball; GourmetDan
To clarify:
DI is now claiming that there is something suspect in the judgment because it incorporates text from one side's arguments. As stated above, that is common legal practice.
That, again, is a claim that they have not proved.
51 posted on
12/12/2006 11:11:28 AM PST by
highball
("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
To: highball
"DI is now claiming that there is something suspect in the judgment because it incorporates text from one side's arguments. As stated above, that is common legal practice." Well, that's not what they claimed but I understand why you need to present it in that manner.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson