To: Robert A. Cook, PE; editor-surveyor
A shopped-for (liberal) judge
You are factually incorrect.
The judge is a Republican, appointed by W. The "shopping" was done by the Discovery Institute, who went looking for a school district foolish enough to provoke a lawsuit. They couldn't get their program in schools on its own merit, so they decided to use the courts.
If you're going to spin, please at least stay within visual distance of the facts.
29 posted on
12/12/2006 10:29:44 AM PST by
highball
("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
To: highball
I appreciate the correction.
33 posted on
12/12/2006 10:39:10 AM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: highball; Robert A. Cook, PE
"
The judge is a Republican, appointed by W. The "shopping" was done by the Discovery Institute, who went looking for a school district foolish enough to provoke a lawsuit. They couldn't get their program in schools on its own merit, so they decided to use the courts." You are factually incorrect.
Not surprising of course, but the Discovery Institute had nothing to do with the school district policy. They were on record as opposed to such policies. They were in the case as a 'friend of the court' to keep the facts straight.
Don't bother to read the issues, it would spoil your 100% incorrect record here.
36 posted on
12/12/2006 10:49:11 AM PST by
editor-surveyor
(Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
To: highball
who went looking for a school district foolish enough to provoke a lawsuit. They couldn't get their program in schools on its own merit, so they decided to use the courts.
That is exactly how they introduced "evolution" into our schools to begin with, isn't it?
69 posted on
12/12/2006 12:06:25 PM PST by
loboinok
(Gun control is hitting what you aim at!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson