Nonsense.
Behe claimed that his book Darwin's Black Box "received even more thorough peer review than a scholarly article in a refereed journal".
Problem is that his "reviewers" have denied hsi claims.
Nice try, though.
If the publisher handled the reviews, then that could have easily been an honest misunderstanding on Behe's part. It is also possible that his reviewers decided that they didn't want to get steamrolled by the PC machine and so decided to "abandon" Behe. When honest, open inquiry is as despised as much as it is among evolutionists, the climate of fear is such that you never know for sure what anyone really thinks.
By the way, do you realize that the gretest scientist who ever lived, Isaac Newton, believed in ID? See my webpage at http://RussP.us/IDscience.htm