As is the DI's statement as far away from the perforative definition of spin as you claim Judge Jones.
Don't you guys ever see that your arguments are completely transferable?
Don't you guys ever see that your arguments are completely transferable?
Any argument is transferable when dealing with a group for which words don't mean things.
Absolutely not. Condensed: A judge decided a case and did a common thing when writing the decision. Notice in the article, "was taken virtually verbatim from the ACLU's proposed 'Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law' submitted to Jones..." The text was proposed, and the judge mostly accepted, as is common practice. Nothing shady here, no intent to deceive, all perfectly straightforward and on record.
Note that if you dig down into the DI's own report, you will see this little disclaimer:
Proposed findings of fact are prepared to assist judges in writing their opinions, and judges are certainly allowed to draw on them. Indeed, judges routinely invite lawyers to propose findings of fact in order to verify what the lawyers believe to be the key factual issues in the case. Thus, in legal circles Judge Jones use of the ACLUs proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law would not be considered plagiarism nor a violation of judicial ethics.Their press release, which is all that most people will read, conveniently doesn't contain the above disclaimer. It instead tries to portray the copying as a misdeed of the judge with quotes like this:
"The new disclosure that Judge Jones' analysis of the scientific status of ID merely copied language written for him by ACLU attorneys underscores just how inappropriate this part of Kitzmiller wasThat is negative spin, while the judge just did business in the open as usual. He may have copied more than is normal in a decision (as opposed to order, which as I have shown the lawyers often write in their entirety), but there is absolutely nothing legally or ethically wrong for a judge to do that.
In other words, the DI is being a sore loser and blowing a lot of hot air about nothing.