[Coyoteman]

West is vice president for public policy and legal affairs for the group's Center for Science and Culture, which issued a statement saying, "The finding that most of Judge Jones' analysis of intelligent design was apparently not the product of his own original deliberative activity seriously undercuts the credibility of Judge Jones' examination of the scientific validity of intelligent design."

Typical Discovery Institute BS.

Both sides submitted their closing briefs. The judge selected those parts that set forth his opinion. This is standard in cases of this type, and the DI folks are dishonest in making a big deal of it. By the way, both closing briefs were posted on the web at the time.

The DI is just upset because their Trojan horse, ID, got pasted.

Here's something else the DI wrote, which somehow leaked out of their control. It sets out their entire strategy: The Wedge Strategy: Center for the Renewal of Science & Culture.

[editor-surveyor]

"Both sides submitted their closing briefs. The judge selected those parts that set forth his opinion. This is standard in cases of this type, and the DI folks are dishonest in making a big deal of it. By the way, both closing briefs were posted on the web at the time."

So when a court's bias causes lies to prevail it's ok?

Typical coyoteman BS.

[xzins]

I'm interested in the basic assertion: was his ruling roughly 90% or so of the ACLU brief?

If nothing else, it says he liked their brief.

But what about the basic fact: is the 90% number true?